lme() with NA in R [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by yjlee168 Homepage – Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 2015-04-20 01:44 (3715 d 10:52 ago) – Posting: # 14710
Views: 29,622

Dear Elmaestro and Helmut,

I like to correct what I have said about lme() with NA. We can use lme(..., na.action=na.exclude) if there are some NA in dataset. Looks like this option can avoid crash if we do not omit NA. Sounds great.

any NA must be removed (as the entire period) first before doing lme(); otherwise, it will crash.[/list] So there is no way to compare the difference.


All the best,
-- Yung-jin Lee
bear v2.9.2:- created by Hsin-ya Lee & Yung-jin Lee
Kaohsiung, Taiwan https://www.pkpd168.com/bear
Download link (updated) -> here
Thread locked

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,673 registered users;
87 visitors (0 registered, 87 guests [including 52 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:36 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5