Mean means [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2015-04-19 11:14 (4079 d 16:40 ago) – Posting: # 14706
Views: 32,945

Hi Helmut,

                                  R        T

❝ Method A (EMA, subjects fixed)   7.328141 7.391880

❝ Method B (EMA, subjects random)  7.328141 7.391880

❝ Method C (FDA = mixed efects)    7.328141 7.391880

❝ Marginal means (Gnumeric)        7.328141 7.391880

❝ So why do we get…

bear                             7.356274 7.420013

❝ … which are ~3.8% higher for both treatments? No, I’m not satisfied if only the PE agrees – I expect to get a nasty surprise once we start to deal with un­ba­lanced data.


You're right, it does look surprising.
Can you ask Phoenix what the log likelihood was when it had identified the minimum and compare with Yung-jin's logLik above?

And what about those DF's?

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
Thread locked

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
235 visitors (0 registered, 235 guests [including 123 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:55 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5