Bug in bear? [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by mittyri  – Russia, 2015-04-14 22:43 (4084 d 00:16 ago) – Posting: # 14688
Views: 33,726

Guten Abend!

❝ Bad news: Something seems to be strange in bear.


I'm a little bit surprised. No validation was performed for replicate design? I've found the validation report only for 2X2X2 crossover (dated 2009)
I know that some companies use Bear for BE estimation during the registration procedure. No statistical validation after installation?

❝ The dataset looks artificial to me – in most cases exactly ±10 in the respective periods…


The author of the package mentioned that these demo sets aren't artificial

Kind regards,
Mittyri
Thread locked

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
154 visitors (0 registered, 154 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:00 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Actually, science starts to become interesting
only where it ends.    Justus von Liebig

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5