Bug in bear? [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by mittyri  – Russia, 2015-04-14 22:43 (3720 d 11:08 ago) – Posting: # 14688
Views: 30,234

Guten Abend!

❝ Bad news: Something seems to be strange in bear.


I'm a little bit surprised. No validation was performed for replicate design? I've found the validation report only for 2X2X2 crossover (dated 2009)
I know that some companies use Bear for BE estimation during the registration procedure. No statistical validation after installation?

❝ The dataset looks artificial to me – in most cases exactly ±10 in the respective periods…


The author of the package mentioned that these demo sets aren't artificial

Kind regards,
Mittyri
Thread locked

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,674 registered users;
97 visitors (0 registered, 97 guests [including 48 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:52 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5