Difficulties with NCA BEAR [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by PK_Lover – Portugal, 2014-11-22 01:07 (3863 d 15:41 ago) – Posting: # 13911
Views: 17,996

Dear yjlee168,

thank you very much for your quick reply (I am honored!).

I am sorry for not replying earlier but I did not have access to the station where I have R installed until now.

Here is the setup (it is the default):

Methods Setting which_is
1 run demo? 0 no
2 study design? 0 2x2x2 crossover
3 single-/multiple-dose 0 single-dose
4 lambda_z estimate 0 adj. R sq. (ARS)
5 trapezoidal AUC 0 linear-up/log-down
6 BE criterion (LL) 80 lower limit
7 ODA? 0 no
8 dose? 100000 dose given
9 dosing interval 24 *multiple-dose only
10 Tlast 120 *multiple-dose only
11 pAUC? 0 all AUC
12 pAUC_start 121 the starting time of pAUC
13 pAUC_end 128 the end time of pAUC
14 IDP output? 0 no

The plot label of x-axis -> Time after Dosing (hr)
and the label of y-axis -> DrugX Plasma Conc. (ng/mL)


And I am using data from a simple Crossover design with 2 periods, single administration.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,673 registered users;
35 visitors (0 registered, 35 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:49 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature
more difficult to explain than
simple, statistically probable things.    Richard Dawkins

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5