Replicate designs [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-11-22 17:11 (4593 d 23:41 ago) – Posting: # 11945
Views: 8,581

Dear userRs!

Yesterday I received an e-mail from the FDA’s CDER/OGD:
<snip>

█ ████ ███████ ████ ██ █████████████ ██ ████████████████████████████ ███ █████ ████ █████████ ███████████. █ ██████ ██████████ ████ ███ ████ ████ █████ █████████████ █████████ ██ ███ ██████. ████ ████████████ ████████ ██ ███ ███ █ █████ ███ ████ ████████ ██ ████ ██ ████ █████████████ ███ ██ ████████████ █ ██████ ██ ███ ███ █████████. █ ████ ███ █████████ ██ ███████ ██ ████ ███ ██ ███ ███ █████ ████ ██ ██ ███ ████ ███████ █████████ ███ █████.

</snip>

Well, I don’t. Given the numerous discussions we had about lme(), nlme:lme(), and lme4:lmer() it seems that it not possible to reproduce FDA’s SAS-code in R (df limbo). Something new from any of you?


PS: Since Donald Schuirmann performed his simulations for NTID-scaling (RTRT|TRTR) in R, FDA should have some code, right?
PPS: Maybe the e-mail was triggered by this or that?


Edit 2013-12-04: Quoted e-mail blacked out as requested by the FDA.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
147 visitors (0 registered, 147 guests [including 29 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:53 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5