PE outside its CI?! [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Jack Homepage – Lancaster, United Kingdom, 2012-12-06 14:20 (4946 d 10:14 ago) – Posting: # 9682
Views: 10,143

Since called upon, I will comment although it may not be overly useful in practice.

In principle it is possible to have a confidence interval that does not include the point estimate that is still valid (i.e. has the correct coverage). It is, however, not something that would be considered a "good" confidence interval because the result of a hypothesis test would not necessarily match the conclusion based on a CI which obviously has all sort of flaws.

The main reasons (but not the only ones) why that is happening is because the point estimate is biased or some non-linear transformation is applied.

Having said all that, I dont really know anything about how these intervals are derived to say something more specific.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
158 visitors (0 registered, 158 guests [including 47 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:34 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists cannot simply hang their subjectivities
up on a hook outside the laboratory door.    Ruth Bleier

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5