Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy Latest Posts Abbreviations

Formulation Effect is irrelevant [General Statistics]

posted by hiren379 – India, 2012-07-28 15:49 (5084 d 10:08 ago) – Posting: # 8988
Views: 6,803

❝ If the CI does not include 100% one will always get a significant formulation effect.

Thanks HS...

But I am not geting how can we claim two formulation bioequivalent if there is significant formulation effect????

Just on the basis that the variability of such difference will be less (narrow CI) how can we claim BE???

If someone can throw some light

Complete thread:

Formulation Effect hiren379 2012-07-28 12:56
- Formulation Effect is irrelevant Helmut 2012-07-28 13:42
  - Formulation Effect is irrelevanthiren379 2012-07-28 13:49
    - Statistically significant ≠ clinically relevant! Helmut 2012-07-28 16:23
      - Statistically significant ≠ clinically relevant! hiren379 2012-08-14 14:51

Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
205 visitors (0 registered, 205 guests [including 24 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:58 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas. Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz

Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Formulation Effect is irrelevant [General Sta­tis­tics]

Complete thread:

Formulation Effect is irrelevant [General Statistics]