Back calculation for QC purpose [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2012-06-25 13:35 (5103 d 02:38 ago) – Posting: # 8844
Views: 7,869

Hi msnaimar,

❝ Obtained k1 and k2 values:

❝ k1 = 1.2071

❝ k2 = 5.4189


So far so good.
I can reproduce your values using this code in R:
x.by.m=c(1.2595, 1.9113, 3.2978, 4.3539, 4.8442, 6.251, 5.843, 5.772, 4.6759)
Ceq=c(0.7409, 1.0893, 1.7033, 2.6475, 5.1578, 8.7521, 14.161, 19.233, 25.3301)
Ceq.by.xbym=Ceq/x.by.m
Muddle=lm(Ceq.by.xbym~Ceq)
Muddle
summary(Muddle)
k2=1/coef(Muddle)[2]
plot(Ceq.by.xbym, Ceq)
k1=1/(k2*coef(Muddle)[1])


When I look at the summary and the plot, the curve does not strike me as necessarily linear all across.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
115 visitors (0 registered, 115 guests [including 16 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:14 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The idea is to try and give all the information to help others
to judge the value of your contribution;
not just the information that leads to judgment
in one particular direction or another.    Richard Feynman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5