Back calculation for QC purpose [General Statistics]
Hi msnaimar,
So far so good.
I can reproduce your values using this code in R:
When I look at the summary and the plot, the curve does not strike me as necessarily linear all across.
❝ Obtained k1 and k2 values:
❝ k1 = 1.2071
❝ k2 = 5.4189
So far so good.
I can reproduce your values using this code in R:
x.by.m=c(1.2595, 1.9113, 3.2978, 4.3539, 4.8442, 6.251, 5.843, 5.772, 4.6759)
Ceq=c(0.7409, 1.0893, 1.7033, 2.6475, 5.1578, 8.7521, 14.161, 19.233, 25.3301)
Ceq.by.xbym=Ceq/x.by.m
Muddle=lm(Ceq.by.xbym~Ceq)
Muddle
summary(Muddle)
k2=1/coef(Muddle)[2]
plot(Ceq.by.xbym, Ceq)
k1=1/(k2*coef(Muddle)[1])When I look at the summary and the plot, the curve does not strike me as necessarily linear all across.
—
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
Complete thread:
- Back calculation for QC purpose msmnainar 2012-06-24 09:06
- Back calculation for QC purpose ElMaestro 2012-06-24 11:12
- Back calculation for QC purpose msmnainar 2012-06-25 05:12
- Back calculation for QC purpose msmnainar 2012-06-25 08:46
- maths versus understanding ElMaestro 2012-06-25 10:36
- maths versus understanding msmnainar 2012-06-25 10:59
- maths versus understanding ElMaestro 2012-06-25 11:03
- maths versus understanding msmnainar 2012-06-25 11:26
- maths versus understanding ElMaestro 2012-06-25 11:03
- maths versus understanding msmnainar 2012-06-25 10:59
- Back calculation for QC purposeElMaestro 2012-06-25 11:35
- Back calculation for QC purpose msmnainar 2012-06-25 12:00
- Back calculation for QC purpose ElMaestro 2012-06-25 13:19
- Back calculation for QC purpose msmnainar 2012-06-25 12:00
- maths versus understanding ElMaestro 2012-06-25 10:36
- Back calculation for QC purpose ElMaestro 2012-06-24 11:12
