'Scaled average' equivalence [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2012-02-23 09:25 (5226 d 05:36 ago) – Posting: # 8162
Views: 4,305

Dear Martin!

❝ For this reason, I would calculate the 90% CI for the ratio µ/µ0 using the corresponding modified Fieller formula and use the widely known confidence interval inclusion approach with margins for ratios for averages relating to 0.5 for the standardized difference (i.e. 0.8 to 1.25) if the CV is smaller than 30%.


❝ what do you think?


I think your approach sounds very reasonable, especially for persons working on the field of BE studies :cool:.
But maybe others prefer Wellek's direct test methods.

❝ PS.: there were no confidence intervals mentioned in the description of the method


Taking the sentence literally is of course 'Kappes' (nonsense).

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
131 visitors (0 registered, 131 guests [including 16 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:02 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The idea is to try and give all the information to help others
to judge the value of your contribution;
not just the information that leads to judgment
in one particular direction or another.    Richard Feynman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5