Log in
RegisterStrange [General Statistics]
posted by Helmut 
– Vienna, Austria, 2012-02-22 15:32 (5226 d 23:36 ago) – Posting: # 8153
Views: 4,345
Dear Martin!
Exactly.
Hhm, no idea. At least in the context of BE this flawed concept was already abandoned with Schuirmann’s TOST in 1983.
❝ […] this criterion is counterproductive, because equivalence is “shown” more likely with a high SD rather than with a small SD and that the effect size is not adequately taken into account.
Exactly.
❝ I would be grateful for your opinion and/or for published references regarding this approach for showing equivalence “statistically”.
Hhm, no idea. At least in the context of BE this flawed concept was already abandoned with Schuirmann’s TOST in 1983.
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
Helmut Schütz
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- showing equivalence based on the standard deviation? martin 2012-02-22 13:36
![[Mix]](https://static.bebac.at/img/mix.png "open in Mix view")
- StrangeHelmut 2012-02-22 14:32
- 'Scaled' average equivalence d_labes 2012-02-22 17:05
- 'Scaled' average equivalence martin 2012-02-22 18:18
- 'Scaled average' equivalence d_labes 2012-02-23 08:25
- 'Scaled' average equivalence martin 2012-02-22 18:18
Ing. Helmut Schütz