Benefit/risk [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2012-02-13 15:29 (5240 d 22:58 ago) – Posting: # 8119
Views: 6,355

Hi ElMaestro!

❝ Generally in statistics an alpha of 5% is considered appropriate. Whether this alpha level is appopriate or not is of course also a good question, but it has stuck for years and seems to be the tradition now.


<bean counting mode>

Not in statistics but in parts of science/engineering where variability is so high that the risk of going for larger sample sizes is considered to give no further benefit. In industry is the buzzword. :-D In the aerospace industry risk is often limited with 10–5 (the best we currently can achieve in software development) + redundant systems which pushes the risk of failure to at least 1:1010.

</bean counting mode>

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
187 visitors (0 registered, 187 guests [including 49 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:28 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5