Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy Latest Posts Abbreviations

90% CI [General Statistics]

posted by rana – India, 2012-02-13 08:51 (5240 d 20:12 ago) – Posting: # 8114
Views: 7,400

Why only 90% Confidence Interval is being used in generally to prove bioequivalence..why can't 80% or 70% ??? What is rationale behind this?

Edit: Category changed. Please follow the Forum’s Policy. [Helmut]

Complete thread:

90% CIrana 2012-02-13 07:51
- 90% CI ElMaestro 2012-02-13 08:07
  - Benefit/risk Helmut 2012-02-13 14:29
    - Benefit/risk ElMaestro 2012-02-13 14:35
      - Benefit/risk Helmut 2012-02-13 14:42
        
        Lean + vendor oversight = no vendor oversight ElMaestro 2012-02-13 15:15
- Patient’s risk = 5% Helmut 2012-02-13 12:41

Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
141 visitors (0 registered, 141 guests [including 28 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:03 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains. Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz

Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

90% CI [General Sta­tis­tics]

Complete thread:

90% CI [General Statistics]