Full Replicate BE study! Calculation Issues [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Chiku – India, 2012-01-10 12:19 (5270 d 03:00 ago) – Posting: # 7891
Views: 4,593

❝ We did a full replicate BE study for EU submission a few days back with 40 volunteers.


(why not partial any reason other than power of study??)

❝ The %ISCV observed for reference product was found to be 28% (in pilot it was 43%:confused:),


happens dear many times..

Option 1 (logic): As both T1 and T2 are given on same subject, mean on the same subject should be cosidered. this method is logical and correct but may not be favourable in your case.. generally we do in partial replicate when SABE is not applicable..

Ray of hope:
As per my statistician SAS has repeatation of code for replicate design analysed as two way cross over so your 2nd option will be correct..
I hope i helped ...

Chiku:)

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
100 visitors (0 registered, 100 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:20 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The idea is to try and give all the information to help others
to judge the value of your contribution;
not just the information that leads to judgment
in one particular direction or another.    Richard Feynman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5