Bravo? [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2011-09-02 11:28 (5403 d 09:57 ago) – Posting: # 7324
Views: 8,524

Dear ElMaestro, dear Helmut!

Cough ... :smoke:
The statistics you do here is at least very approximative.

Consider that you evaluate data from a crossover study that are not independent, i.e. the AE counts under Test or Reference may come from the same subject(s).

Keywords (evaluation of incidence of one sort of AEs, f.i. SOC General):
McNemar test if you neglect period effects,
Mainland-Gart or Prescott's test considering period effects.

See for this
Stephen Senn
"Cross-over Trials in Clinical Research"
Chapter 4
Wiley, Chichester 2002

See this online paper for a SAS solution and/or for a description how these tests work.

A test of the whole AE profile from a cross-over I'm not aware of, sorry.

@EM: Full ACK with Helmut's rating of the jargon. Brilliant as always from you :cool:.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
163 visitors (0 registered, 163 guests [including 14 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:26 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

“Data! Data! Data!” he cried impatiently.
“I can’t make bricks without clay!”    Arthur Conan Doyle

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5