Handling of dividing subject in two groups [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by beman – 2011-09-01 18:24 (5401 d 05:15 ago) – Posting: # 7319
Views: 4,763

Dear All,

in a 2x2-crossover BE-Study with 80 subject the subjects are divided in two groups with 40 Subject due to clinical capacity.

Treatment date of group 1: 1.9 (treatment 1) and 8.9 (treatment 2)
Treatment date of group 1: 4.9 (treatment 1) and 11.9 (treatment 2)

With is the most appropriate approach (from statistical and from guideline point of view):

a)
usual 2x2-ANOVA model with Terms SUBJECT PERIOD FORM with 2 Periods
(treatment 1 --> period 1, treatment 2 --> period 2)

proc GLM data=work.dummi;
   class SUBJECT PERIOD FORM;
   model LogAUCT LogCmax = SUBJECT PERIOD FORM/ SS3;
   lsmeans FORM / pdiff CL alpha=0.10;


b)
usual 2x2-ANOVA model (see code above) with Terms SUBJECT PERIOD FORM with 4 Periods
(treatment 1, group 1 --> period 1, treatment 1, group 2 --> period 2, treatment 2, group 1 --> period 3, treatment 2, group 2 --> period 4)

c)
including a TERM 'GROUP' in the ANOVA-Model. And which is the best way ? 2 stage design way without alpha-adjustment ?

d)
way proposed form a non-statistican (of our sponsor)

proc GLM data=work.dummi;
   class SUBJECT GROUP PERIOD FORM;
   model LogAUCT LogCmax = SUBJECT GROUP PERIOD FORM/ SS3;
   lsmeans FORM / pdiff CL alpha=0.10;


approach does not work ;-) because of zero degrees of freedom for the factor group ;-)

Best regards and thank you in advance

BEman

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,571 registered users;
116 visitors (0 registered, 116 guests [including 21 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:40 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The idea is to try and give all the information to help others
to judge the value of your contribution;
not just the information that leads to judgment
in one particular direction or another.    Richard Feynman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5