G matrix [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2011-05-03 10:26 (5522 d 16:20 ago) – Posting: # 6978
Views: 13,725

Dear J. Detlor!

❝ d_labes this is an excellent reply IMHO.


Thanks for the flowers.

❝ The only addition I would make would be to point out that the SUBJ= option in the RANDOM statement is absent from the second set of code.

❝ ...

❝ If we ignore this option in the RANDOM statement we are assuming the data is from 1 subject only, and thus the G matrix is not in a block-diagonal format.


Really?

I got the G matrix for the second code set (armcd renamed to sequence) for the above mentioned Example 9.3.3 in Chow/Liu - a 2-sequence-3-period replicate study as:
                                Estimated G Matrix

 Row  Effect             sequence  subject    Col1      Col2     Col3    ...

   1  subject(sequence)  RTT        1       75.6238
   2  subject(sequence)  RTT        3                 75.6238
   3  subject(sequence)  RTT        4                           75.6238
...
                                        ...  Col10     Col11     Col12   ...
  10  subject(sequence)  TRR        2       75.6238
  11  subject(sequence)  TRR        5                 75.6238
  12  subject(sequence)  TRR        6                           75.6238
...


For me this looks block diagonal at its best :cool:.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,571 registered users;
154 visitors (0 registered, 154 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 02:47 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Always listen to experts.
They’ll tell you what can’t be done and why.
Then do it.    Robert A. Heinlein

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5