Replicate Designs & IntraSubj CV [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2011-04-28 17:00 (5527 d 09:46 ago) – Posting: # 6965
Views: 13,871

Dear randombadger!

❝ I have a 3 period, 2 treatment XO design and would like to calculate the intra-subject CV for the two treatments.


Can you be a little be more specific? In some designs it’s possible to calculate CVs for both treatments, and in others not. FDA’s model for the commonly used partial replicate [TRR|RTR|RRT] is overspecified – you may get a number for CVWT, but only with a SAS-warning and being nonsense (since T is not replicated). Examples of 3-period replicate designs allowing estimation of both CVs are [TRT|RTR] or [TRT|RTR|TRR|RTT]. So which design do you have?

❝ According to FDA guidance, […]



Almost. You should use ddfm=satterth (Satterthwaite’s degrees of freedom) – not ddfm=kr (Kenward-Rogers); though I guess there shouldn’t be too much of a difference in results.

❝ however I see my colleagues are using the following: […]



Can you ask them for a reference for their code?

❝ My colleagues also included a carryover in the model but I believe the washout periods are long enough hence not required.


Carryover should go the statistical waste-bin. Stephen Senn devoted (almost) an entire book to this topic.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,571 registered users;
150 visitors (0 registered, 150 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 02:46 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Always listen to experts.
They’ll tell you what can’t be done and why.
Then do it.    Robert A. Heinlein

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5