Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

normocaloric vs high fat meal [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2010-12-15 17:53 (5661 d 03:58 ago) – Posting: # 6309
Views: 5,641

Dear Helmut!

❝ Well, pooling doesn't make sense, of course. A comparison of subjects

❝ under test (meal type 1 in study 1 vs. meal type 2 in study 2) is a

❝ parallel design and imbalanced (Dan knows). The same holds for reference.

❝ Therefore one would get two assessments.

Ok. I understand . But this relies on the assumption of no period effect I think?

What do you think about an evaluation via incomplete blocks cross-over (I hope the terminus is the correct one )? I.e. 4-treatment-4-sequence-2-period cross-over. T1, R1 are under normocaloric conditions, T2, R2 under high-fat.

Complete thread:

• normocaloric vs high fat meal Dr_Dan 2010-12-15 09:49 
  • normocaloric vs high fat meal Helmut 2010-12-15 13:50
    • normocaloric vs high fat meal d_labes 2010-12-15 15:37
      • normocaloric vs high fat meal Helmut 2010-12-15 16:10
        • normocaloric vs high fat meald_labes 2010-12-15 16:53
          • normocaloric vs high fat meal Helmut 2010-12-15 17:03
    • normocaloric vs high fat meal Dr_Dan 2010-12-15 16:33