Statistical analysis of Cmax values < LOQ [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2010-09-30 01:20 (5748 d 09:33 ago) – Posting: # 5963
Views: 7,629

Dear Martin,

❝ - all concentrations over time are <LOQ for ca. 40% of subjects (no

  Cmax available)


It is not clear what the purpose of the trial is but I am willing to bet a monthly salary on the fact that the study report when reviewed by an assessor will not do much for you, whatever you do.

The 40% being <LOQ is extremely unexpected unless everybody in your team had had a stroke the day the trial was planned (which I think is unlikely, but feel free to comment).
For this reason, send out an auditor; do a for-cause audit to look at the trial itself and the bioanalysis. Make sure the auditor comes home to give you a really qualified idea of whether the observed problem is a real problem. I highly recommend you to use an auditor that looks for more than just missing signatures or misspelling on training records.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
206 visitors (0 registered, 206 guests [including 19 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:54 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Ignorance more frequently begets confidence
than does knowledge.    Charles Darwin

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5