SAS and/or Phoenix/WinNonlin-experts around? [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2010-07-13 04:29 (5822 d 02:43 ago) – Posting: # 5613
Views: 17,027

Dear Paolo!

Had a quick look in Phoenix6.1 (average BE, too late to get FDA's model running).
Fixed: SEQUENCE+TREATMEN+PERIOD
Repeated Specification:
PERIOD
Variance Blocking Variables (Subject): SUBJECT
Group: TREATMEN
Type: Variance Components
Random Effects: TREATMEN
Variance Blocking Variables (Subject): SUBJECT
Type: Banded No-Diagonal Factor Analytic (f)
Number of factors (f): 2

I got:
Warning 11091: Newton's algorithm converged with modified Hessian. Output is suspect.
Model may be over-specified. A simpler model could be tried.

and sigma²WR 0.1861995 (CVWR 0.452397)

If I try IBE/PBE I got:
*** WARNING 11121: Subject X had incomplete design and was discarded.
*** WARNING 11122: Sequence RTR had less than two complete subjects and was discarded.
*** WARNING 11122: Sequence TRR had less than two complete subjects and was discarded.
*** ERROR 11107: Fewer than two sequences had complete design. Program termininating.

X in the warning above is the ID of all subjects except ones in sequence RRT. That was it. :confused:


P.S.: Please delete anything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post!

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
132 visitors (0 registered, 132 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 07:13 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5