many ANOVA but only one trial [General Statistics]
Dear All,
According to above recommendations for 4-way crossover study, I am a little bit weird because we were planning to conduct at least two ANOVA tables from only one trial.
This is a possible example.
Unlike bioequivalence study, it is for proving equivalence. So the F and ANOVA are not the answer to prove equivalence BUT the thing everyone needs to know is whether 90%CI is in 80-125%.
Best Regards,
BL
According to above recommendations for 4-way crossover study, I am a little bit weird because we were planning to conduct at least two ANOVA tables from only one trial.
This is a possible example.
- The overall ANOVA may be produced to tell that there is any significance, the formulation may be a main effect and food is block effect, something like this... but any variance in this ANOVA is not suitable to conduct 90%CI to prove equivalence in both conditions. So
- Some data in some periods and sequences are selected to produce ANOVA for obtaining the MSE to conduct 90%CI of T/R ratio under fed condition. and
- Some data in some periods and sequences are selected to produce ANOVA for obtaining the MSE to conduct 90%CI of T/R ratio under fasting condition.
Unlike bioequivalence study, it is for proving equivalence. So the F and ANOVA are not the answer to prove equivalence BUT the thing everyone needs to know is whether 90%CI is in 80-125%.
Best Regards,
BL
Complete thread:
- 4-period BE study fed/fasting: statistical issues Amandine 2009-06-04 12:31
- Confounded effects; common variance Helmut 2009-06-04 12:55
- Neglecting period effects? d_labes 2009-06-10 10:10
- Assumptions... Helmut 2009-06-23 14:38
- What if... Ohlbe 2010-03-10 14:27
- What if... Dr_Dan 2010-03-11 15:50
- What if… Helmut 2010-03-11 16:39
- What if… Dr_Dan 2010-03-12 08:49
- Need-to-know / nice-to-know Helmut 2010-03-12 11:35
- many ANOVA but only one trialboonchai_l 2010-05-24 11:53
- many ANOVA but only one trial GSTATS 2010-06-08 21:52
- many ANOVA but only one trialboonchai_l 2010-05-24 11:53
- Need-to-know / nice-to-know Helmut 2010-03-12 11:35
- What if… Dr_Dan 2010-03-12 08:49
- What if… Helmut 2010-03-11 16:39
- What if... Dr_Dan 2010-03-11 15:50
- Neglecting period effects? d_labes 2009-06-10 10:10
- Confounded effects; common variance Helmut 2009-06-04 12:55
