Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Meta-analysis vs. naïve pooling [General Statistics]

posted by ElMaestro – Denmark, 2010-04-10 10:13 (5918 d 02:29 ago) – Posting: # 5075
Views: 10,607
(edited on 2010-04-10 12:34)

Goede morgen,

❝ Well, how to set up your interaction?

I only know R (Study:Per)¹.
But it could also be faked by calling the periods of the second study "3" and "4" etc. Then no need to specify the interaction, I think.

EM.

Addendum: Just re-read your post - you are suggesting exactly the same if I interpret your post right?

1: Sorry wrote Trt:Per at first - typo.

Complete thread:

Meta-analysis earlybird 2010-04-09 07:54
- Meta-analysis in SAS d_labes 2010-04-09 08:35
  - Meta-analysis vs. naïve pooling Helmut 2010-04-09 20:33
    - Meta-analysis vs. naïve pooling ElMaestro 2010-04-09 22:02
      - Meta-analysis vs. naïve pooling Helmut 2010-04-09 22:11
        
        Meta-analysis vs. naïve pooling ElMaestro 2010-04-09 22:20
        
        Meta-analysis vs. naïve pooling Helmut 2010-04-10 00:49
        
        Meta-analysis vs. naïve poolingElMaestro 2010-04-10 08:13
        
        Yes, but... Helmut 2010-04-10 14:46
        
        Yes, but... ElMaestro 2010-04-11 11:44
        
        Yes, but... Helmut 2010-04-11 14:27
    - Meta-analysis alpha d_labes 2010-04-12 13:32
      - Meta-analysis alpha Helmut 2010-04-12 14:25
        
        2-Study Meta-analysis d_labes 2010-04-12 15:03
        
        2-Study Meta-analysis Helmut 2010-04-12 15:18
        
        Anatomical miracle d_labes 2010-04-12 15:33
        
        Anatomical miracle Helmut 2010-04-12 15:40

Meta-analysis vs. naïve pooling [General Sta­tis­tics]

Complete thread:

Meta-analysis vs. naïve pooling [General Statistics]