Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Meta-analysis vs. naïve pooling [General Statistics]

posted by Helmut – Vienna, Austria, 2010-04-10 02:49 (5913 d 23:46 ago) – Posting: # 5074
Views: 10,861

Ahoi, ElMaestro!

❝ […] I have not thought this fully through […] because I am not a statistician.

Me not either. Maybe codes for period should be simply 1-4.

Pooled: n=25, 95.19% (91.11% - 99.46%), CV_intra 9.03%

Results identical for all models (yeah, treatments still within). Well, how to set up your interaction?

Goede wind!

—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Meta-analysis earlybird 2010-04-09 07:54
- Meta-analysis in SAS d_labes 2010-04-09 08:35
  - Meta-analysis vs. naïve pooling Helmut 2010-04-09 20:33
    - Meta-analysis vs. naïve pooling ElMaestro 2010-04-09 22:02
      - Meta-analysis vs. naïve pooling Helmut 2010-04-09 22:11
        
        Meta-analysis vs. naïve pooling ElMaestro 2010-04-09 22:20
        
        Meta-analysis vs. naïve poolingHelmut 2010-04-10 00:49
        
        Meta-analysis vs. naïve pooling ElMaestro 2010-04-10 08:13
        
        Yes, but... Helmut 2010-04-10 14:46
        
        Yes, but... ElMaestro 2010-04-11 11:44
        
        Yes, but... Helmut 2010-04-11 14:27
    - Meta-analysis alpha d_labes 2010-04-12 13:32
      - Meta-analysis alpha Helmut 2010-04-12 14:25
        
        2-Study Meta-analysis d_labes 2010-04-12 15:03
        
        2-Study Meta-analysis Helmut 2010-04-12 15:18
        
        Anatomical miracle d_labes 2010-04-12 15:33
        
        Anatomical miracle Helmut 2010-04-12 15:40

Meta-analysis vs. naïve pooling [General Sta­tis­tics]

Complete thread:

Meta-analysis vs. naïve pooling [General Statistics]