What if… [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Dr_Dan  – Germany, 2010-03-12 09:49 (5942 d 14:05 ago) – Posting: # 4900
Views: 15,814

Dear Helmut
You are a statistician, I am a project manager. The purpose of a bioequivalence study is not to describe the full pharmacokinetics (including food effect) of a drug entity but to detect differences between galenic formulations. Since it is acceptable to conduct either two separate two-way cross over-studies or a four-way cross-over study in cases where information is required in both the fed and fasted states I would always suggest to perform two separate two-way cross over-studies. I totally agree that from a scientific point of view the four-way cross-over study is much more interesting but from a practical (generic company's) point of view you should prefer the other option.
Kind regards
Dan

Kind regards and have a nice day
Dr_Dan

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
136 visitors (0 registered, 136 guests [including 16 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:54 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

“Data! Data! Data!” he cried impatiently.
“I can’t make bricks without clay!”    Arthur Conan Doyle

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5