Absolute bioavailability [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2010-02-07 00:13 (5974 d 07:33 ago) – Posting: # 4725
Views: 3,036

Dear Stefano!

❝ the AUCs are compared based on an ANOVA model...


Right. PE, confidence interval, end of story.

❝ However, in several papers I found absolute BA calculated for each subject

❝ (usually reported as F) and summarized using descriptive statistics.


IMHO this would only make sense for a balanced study to have a 'quick look' on the geometric mean. If the study was imbalanced this value may be misleading.

❝ In my opinion this second approach may be useful to provide some support to

❝ the result obtained using the ANOVA, but it can not be considered as the

❝ analysis of primary interest.


I do not see how this would support the result of a statistical model. I would say it's redundant at the best.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
154 visitors (0 registered, 154 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:47 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5