Balaam's design, sample size doubled one more time [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2009-09-28 13:58 (6104 d 16:21 ago) – Posting: # 4258
Views: 8,649

Dear Helmut,

uups, you have caught me red handed! :surprised:

My statement came from the factor 2 in the sample size formula on page 757, containing the number of subjects per sequence.
But I forgot here we have four sequences compared to two of the classical 2x2 cross-over.

Lesson learned: Think twice and check ones assumptions before touting it half-cooked to the audience. Sorry.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,571 registered users;
123 visitors (0 registered, 123 guests [including 21 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:19 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Always listen to experts.
They’ll tell you what can’t be done and why.
Then do it.    Robert A. Heinlein

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5