Assumptions... [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2009-06-23 16:38 (6214 d 07:19 ago) – Posting: # 3894
Views: 16,683

Dear D. Labes,

welcome back from Salzburg!

❝ What exactly You mean with "evaluated as a paired design"?


Well, with the proposed design one avoids confounding issues, but you are right that one must assume lacking period effects!
This may sound weird in the first place, but is regularily used in designs where a single dose phase is followed by a steady state phase in order to assess accumulation: AUCtau (MD) vs. AUCinf (SD). In my experience nobody sets up the study in such a way that in ½ of the subjects the study is started with the multiple dose phase first. Any potential period effects in such a design are ignored as well.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
213 visitors (0 registered, 213 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:57 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5