4-period BE study fed/fasting: statistical issues [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Amandine – 2009-06-04 14:31 (6223 d 01:13 ago) – Posting: # 3820
Views: 18,530

Dear all,

We are preparing a 4-period single-dose BE study under both fed and fasting conditions (as described in the new draft BE/BA EMEA guidance: Test fast/Ref fast/Test fed/Ref fed).

However, the product we are developing has a great food effect and a high within-subject variability in fed conditions (not under fasting conditions).

Our concern is:What is your opinion about this design? Is it more risky than two 2-way studies?
Do you confirm the increase of residual variability in such a study and the difficulties to prove bioequivalence under fasting conditions?

Thank you in advance for your answers.

Best regards.

Amandine

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,571 registered users;
181 visitors (0 registered, 181 guests [including 17 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:45 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

“Data! Data! Data!” he cried impatiently.
“I can’t make bricks without clay!”    Arthur Conan Doyle

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5