4-period BE study fed/fasting: statistical issues [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Amandine – 2009-06-04 14:31 (6221 d 09:25 ago) – Posting: # 3820
Views: 18,525

Dear all,

We are preparing a 4-period single-dose BE study under both fed and fasting conditions (as described in the new draft BE/BA EMEA guidance: Test fast/Ref fast/Test fed/Ref fed).

However, the product we are developing has a great food effect and a high within-subject variability in fed conditions (not under fasting conditions).

Our concern is:What is your opinion about this design? Is it more risky than two 2-way studies?
Do you confirm the increase of residual variability in such a study and the difficulties to prove bioequivalence under fasting conditions?

Thank you in advance for your answers.

Best regards.

Amandine

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,571 registered users;
125 visitors (0 registered, 125 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:57 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Always listen to experts.
They’ll tell you what can’t be done and why.
Then do it.    Robert A. Heinlein

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5