Transformed data analysis only (AUC, Cmax) [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2009-05-26 16:24 (6244 d 22:19 ago) – Posting: # 3765
Views: 8,480

❝ Therefore the analysis with the narrower CI should be considered the “valid” one. The acceptance by regulatory authorities even at that time was close to zero. Nowadays: no chance.


Nowadays: the analysis with the wider CI would be considered as the 'valid' one. 'Conservative' approach, they would call it.

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
272 visitors (0 registered, 272 guests [including 23 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:44 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Try to learn something about everything
and everything about something.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5