Transformed data analysis only (AUC, Cmax) [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2009-05-26 16:24 (6230 d 14:56 ago) – Posting: # 3765
Views: 8,273

❝ Therefore the analysis with the narrower CI should be considered the “valid” one. The acceptance by regulatory authorities even at that time was close to zero. Nowadays: no chance.


Nowadays: the analysis with the wider CI would be considered as the 'valid' one. 'Conservative' approach, they would call it.

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
159 visitors (0 registered, 159 guests [including 19 identified bots]).
Forum time: 07:21 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5