Transformed data analysis only (AUC, Cmax) [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2009-05-25 19:01 (6230 d 22:40 ago) – Posting: # 3751
Views: 8,572

Dear Kevan!

❝ I faced a problem in calculation of CI of transformed and non-transformed data. The CI of transformed data was outside the accepted range (80-125) while the non-transformed data in the accepted range (80-120).


❝ Most of the guidelines focus on the transformed data.


Right (at least for AUC, Cmax,...). The use of the log-transformation is supported by two assumptions:
  1. Pharmacokinetics
    Like many biological metrics AUC, Cmax,… follow a log-normal distribution: skweded to the right and limited to the left. The definition of AUC = F × D / CL also supports a multiplicative model.
  2. Bioanalytics
    Serial dilutions in the preparation of stock solutions lead to a multiplicative error model (propagation of uncertainty).

❝ Any statistical method to show that the transformed data is not valid in this case?


I hope you have stated a method in the protocol? It does not make sense to select between log-transformed and untransformed analyses. Give it a try. Run any normality test (Shapiro-Wilk, Anderson-Darling,…) on the intra-subject residuals of both the log-transformed and the untransformed data. If you don't have discordant outliers in the data set I bet that both tests will come up with a nonsignificant result. In other words, you can not select the distribution based on a statistical test given the small sample size in a BE study. Therefore you have to stick with the log-transformed analysis.

The only exception I know comes from Japan (Q&A Document, November 2006, my private translation):

Q-32. Is logarithmic transformation always necessary? Is it not acceptable to carry out logarithmic transformation only when required?
(A) Based on the principle of international harmonisation, assessment should be made using values after logarithmic transformation. If it is not appropriate to analyse with transformed data, for example, when untransformed data shows normal distribution but transformed data shows non-normal distribution, you may state as such and use untransformed data for the assessment.


❝ How can I make conclusion for the study?


Your study was not able to demonstrate BE. Sorry.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,571 registered users;
153 visitors (0 registered, 153 guests [including 23 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:41 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Always listen to experts.
They’ll tell you what can’t be done and why.
Then do it.    Robert A. Heinlein

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5