IR tid vs. MR oad [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2009-04-21 15:44 (6266 d 00:43 ago) – Posting: # 3574
Views: 4,157

Dear KR!

❝ Can anyone throw some focus on dose normalization for two way crossover

❝ study? i.e if reference product is of 30 mg given once daily and test

❝ product is of 10 mg given thrice daily then how to do pharmacokinetic and

❝ statistical analysis?


Your design sounds a little bit strange. The reference obviously is an MR formulation and you want to develop an IR? Is there no IR reference available? What's the rationale to come up with an IR formulation (compliance issues)? But if you want to do that:

❝ What is the effect of this dose on concentration values?


OK, you will have three Cmax values for the IR formulation. Whether they will be different or not depends on the dosage interval (thrice daily for some antibiotics means strictly 8/8/8 hours; for many drugs morning/after lunch/after dinner would mean 6/6/12 hours) and the half life of the drug (accumulation?). With some knowledge of the PK it is possible to get an idea about the expected levels for test/reference. This is useful in designing the sampling scheme. But again: it does not make sense to compare the rate of BA.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,571 registered users;
155 visitors (0 registered, 155 guests [including 18 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:28 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5