Comparative pharmacokinetics [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2009-01-13 22:28 (6362 d 20:56 ago) – Posting: # 3027
Views: 7,536

Dear ElMaestro!

❝ [...] I do not find that quote utterly clear,


Me not either...

❝ I would be inclined to say that comparative pharmacokinetics [...] would be BE.


I would stick with EMEA's definition that a BE study is a comparative BA study, which is designed to demonstrate BE and the reference is the innovator's product.

In BA we compare essentially the absorption, whereas for example in PK interaction studies also the clearance.
IMHO there's an endless number of possibilities of comparing PK (interactions, disease states, covariates in PopPK like sex, age, creatine clearance, body weight, surface area, :blahblah:). That's why I aked for more informations about the rationale and design of Santosh's study.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,571 registered users;
111 visitors (0 registered, 111 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:25 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Always listen to experts.
They’ll tell you what can’t be done and why.
Then do it.    Robert A. Heinlein

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5