treatment effect [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2008-11-19 10:38 (6418 d 23:44 ago) – Posting: # 2729
Views: 3,446

Dear Shri,

treatment effect is not very important. Regulators do not regard a significant treatment effect as a problem. In a BE study you are using two different treatments so you know they are 'a little bit different'. It's the the magnitude of the (estimated) difference in combo with the associated uncertainty that matters. In other words, the CI.

To answer your question, I don't think I have a better explanation for a significant treatment effect than the fact that there are two different treatments involved. It takes some getting used to, esp. because significant trt effect and CI's that does not include 1.0 go hand-in-hand.

EM.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,570 registered users;
150 visitors (0 registered, 150 guests [including 19 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:22 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5