Carry-over → 🚮 [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Mahmoud  – Jordan, 2025-12-09 11:47 (176 d 17:23 ago) – Posting: # 24525
Views: 3,478

Dear Helmut

This is not true to delete carry-over from your vocabulary

some crosover designs need carry-over in the model

Please do not write anythings without refs

your not statistician

❝ ❝ please delete carry-over from your vocabulary.

❝

❝ Good point...... but CRLs won't leave you without these questions.... somehow regulators seems to be obsessed with that borderline "Carry-over"


Edit: correction in 2nd post merged with first. You can edit your post within 24 hours from the original submission, please see FAQ #3 [Ohlbe]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,571 registered users;
410 visitors (0 registered, 410 guests [including 24 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:11 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I’m all in favor of the democratic principle
that one idiot is as good as one genius, but I draw the line
when someone takes the next step and concludes
that two idiots are better than one genius.    Leo Szilard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5