Question about computing 90% CI w data from 2 separate studies [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2024-10-14 17:45 (597 d 14:36 ago) – Posting: # 24230
Views: 6,047

Hi BEQool,

>❝ I doubt that your model even gives you anything? Do you get any results?

Oh, I got a bunch of non-estimables because there were not enough degrees of freedom left. Obviously, I had more terms in the model than degrees of freedom. I think I got only the LSMeans of the 2 treatments, but nothing else could be estimated.

Thanks again for your feedback. I am going to try the following codes later today. What do you think?

PROC MIXED data=BEdata;
CLASSES SUBJECT TRT;
MODEL logval = TRT/ DDFM=SATTERTH;
RANDOM TRT/TYPE=FA0(2) SUB=SUBJECT G;
REPEATED/GRP=TRT SUB=SUBJECT;
ESTIMATE 'T vs. R' TRT 1 -1/CL ALPHA=0.1;
lsmeans TRT/ cl alpha=0.1; * <-- for parallel design studies, alpha=0.1;
ods output lsmeans=lsmeans;         * Least Squares means Output;
ods output covparms=covparms;       * Covariance output;
ods output estimates=ests;          * Estimate of differences between treatments;


Thx
J

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,571 registered users;
362 visitors (0 registered, 362 guests [including 18 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:21 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I’m all in favor of the democratic principle
that one idiot is as good as one genius, but I draw the line
when someone takes the next step and concludes
that two idiots are better than one genius.    Leo Szilard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5