Rationale? [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2008-09-26 14:39 (6476 d 06:03 ago) – Posting: # 2423
Views: 5,209

Dear Ravi,

❝ My question is can we test for BE among T1, T2 and T3 using one of the test product as reference. When T1, T2 and T3 are available in dose strength 550mg, 850mg and 1150mg respectively. If yes please explain a bit about appropriate design to be used.


Still I don’t understand the rationale of the study. You said you wanted to compare all three tests vs. reference. So I assumed thatWhat’s the strength of the reference?
Why do you want to show BE between tests?
The design to be applied is straightforward – a 4-period 4-sequence Williams’ design (see this post). If you are not sure about PK linearity I would go with separate 2×2 studies. Imagine a situation where one of the three T/R-comparisons fails: You will have to submit the entire package to authorities, containing the first 4×4 study plus a repeated 2×2 of the failed formulation. Not so nice.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
177 visitors (0 registered, 177 guests [including 32 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:42 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5