Question about computing 90% CI w data from 2 separate studies [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2024-10-14 17:40 (613 d 19:20 ago) – Posting: # 24229
Views: 6,264

Hi Divyen,

❝ Are the reference and test lot same in both the studies? If no- then what is the purpose of further statistics? If yes- why was there a difference in Ratio if any?


Both ref and test lots are different between the two studies.

Thx
J

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
198 visitors (0 registered, 198 guests [including 51 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:00 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5