Subject effect justification [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Relaxation  – Germany, 2024-01-17 13:30 (443 d 09:52 ago) – Posting: # 23831
Views: 2,358

Dear Dafni_C.

Just for clarification of the background.
You conducted an ANOVA (or mixed effects model) with the effects "treatment", "sequence" and "period" as well as the effect "subject(sequence)"?
And in your "ANOVA"-table the p-value of "subject(sequence)" was found to be statistically significant?

There are more qualified persons here, but ...
this indicates that the subjects in the trial were different people, so that normally would be expected to be "significant", right?

If you mean the "sequence" effect or something else, you may find the information available in the "Articles" (see header at the very top) helpful.

Best regards!

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,413 posts in 4,924 threads, 1,667 registered users;
87 visitors (0 registered, 87 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:23 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Nothing shows a lack of mathematical education more
than an overly precise calculation.    Carl Friedrich Gauß

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5