Log in
RegisterVariance VS Coefficient of variation [General Statistics]
Hello!
In the formulas for calculating the number of subjects on logarithmic scale, should we use the variance or the coefficient of variation? In Chow's paper (On Sample Size Calculation in Bioequivalence Trials, 2001) we see the variance in the formula on log-sclae while in his book (Design and Analysis of Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies, 2009) we see th coefficient of variation in the formula on log-scale.
Thank you in advance.
In the formulas for calculating the number of subjects on logarithmic scale, should we use the variance or the coefficient of variation? In Chow's paper (On Sample Size Calculation in Bioequivalence Trials, 2001) we see the variance in the formula on log-sclae while in his book (Design and Analysis of Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies, 2009) we see th coefficient of variation in the formula on log-scale.
Thank you in advance.
Complete thread:
- Variance VS Coefficient of variationImph 2023-02-27 09:09
![[Mix]](https://static.bebac.at/img/mix.png "open in Mix view")
- s² ↔ CV Helmut 2023-02-27 13:00
- CV ≈ s for low variances mittyri 2023-02-27 20:45
- CV ≈ s for low variances Helmut 2023-02-28 10:24
- CV ≈ s for low variances Imph 2023-03-06 12:42
- CV ≈ s for low variances Helmut 2023-02-28 10:24
- CV ≈ s for low variances mittyri 2023-02-27 20:45
- s² ↔ CV Helmut 2023-02-27 13:00
Ing. Helmut Schütz