'Randomisation' for RR/RR design [General Statistics]
Dear Ohlbe,
Yes, but it's bullshit. DLabes already gave a nice explanation in his post.
Thanks for thinking aloud - sometimes you don't to see the wood for the trees...
❝ If I get the point correctly, your idea is to reproduce the same ANOVA model as what you would have in a conventional 2x2 study, is that right ?
Yes, but it's bullshit. DLabes already gave a nice explanation in his post.
Thanks for thinking aloud - sometimes you don't to see the wood for the trees...

—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- 'Randomisation' for RR/RR design Helmut 2008-08-21 14:10
- 'Randomisation' for RR/RR design ElMaestro 2008-08-21 14:32
- 'Randomisation' for RR/RR design Ohlbe 2008-08-21 15:17
- 'Randomisation' for RR/RR designHelmut 2008-08-21 17:22
- 'Randomisation' for RR/RR design d_labes 2008-08-21 16:59
- 'Randomisation' for RR/RR design Helmut 2008-08-21 17:16
