Can we use 2x2 crossover results for Replicated Design [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2008-08-19 16:59 (6513 d 11:09 ago) – Posting: # 2198
Views: 3,979

Dear Ashwini!

❝ Can we use 2x2 crossover studies results for the prediction of 90% C.I. of AUC and Cmax for replicated design (e.g. 3 period, 4 period etc)


Not easily. You may use results from a 2×2 study to perform sample size planning. It's a good idea to add a safety margin on CVintra (i.e., calculate an upper confidence interval) as well.
Then you run the replicate study and wait. Remember that any particular study is just a sample of many (theoretically an infinite number of) potential studies. If you really want a prediction with some given confidence, you should:

❝ Is there any method in winnonlin or SAS.

  1. You have to run a PopPK first (NONMEM, WinBugs, WinNonMix, Kinetica).
  2. No (although there's some other software by Pharsight called Trial Simulator; trial simulation will be an integrated part of the PopPK module of version 6 'Phoenix' of WinNonlin).
  3. Everything is possible in
    [image]. :rotfl:

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
239 visitors (0 registered, 239 guests [including 125 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:09 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5