Adjusted indirect comparisons: Algebra [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2020-10-01 19:03 (2071 d 18:32 ago) – Posting: # 21961
Views: 5,923

Dear Helmut,

❝ ... The error term in the 2×2×2 crossover is given by $$SE_\textrm{(d)}=SE_\Delta=\widehat{\sigma}_\textrm{w}\sqrt{\frac{1}{n_\textrm{1}}+\frac{1}{n_\textrm{2}}},\tag{2}$$where \(\small{\widehat{\sigma}_\textrm{w}=SD_\textrm{w}=\sqrt{MSE}}\) from ANOVA. Alternatively we can write $$SE_\Delta=\sqrt{\frac{SD_{\textrm{w}}^{2}}{2}\left (\frac{1}{n_\textrm{1}}+\frac{1}{n_\textrm{2}}\right )}\tag{3}$$

Here I can't follow you. From where arises the 2 in formula (3)

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,571 registered users;
304 visitors (0 registered, 304 guests [including 27 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:36 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I’m all in favor of the democratic principle
that one idiot is as good as one genius, but I draw the line
when someone takes the next step and concludes
that two idiots are better than one genius.    Leo Szilard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5