How to deal with a sequence effect? [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2008-08-11 16:50 (6518 d 04:19 ago) – Posting: # 2166
Views: 11,342

Dear HS,

eventually I missed your point.

My practical experience regarding interaction studies is zero or below.
But if I had understood your suggestion above in the thread, and the chapter in Hauschke et. al., it is enough in a first step of analysis to show that the AUC ratio is with the commonly applied acceptance range. Whatever the correct wording for this result may be.

This was the case in Frieda's study.
Just to cite her initial post:
"The ratio T to R for AUCtau on the last dosing day (n=21) was 0.89, 90% CI 0.85 to 0.94; similar values were obtained for Cmax."

Why to seek for an explanation that this result is wrong?
This seems illogical to me futher on.
(regardless of fiddling with the German purity law for beer, oh no, no, of course for statistics :-P )

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,571 registered users;
119 visitors (0 registered, 119 guests [including 14 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:09 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Always listen to experts.
They’ll tell you what can’t be done and why.
Then do it.    Robert A. Heinlein

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5