Very, very strange! [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Shuanghe  – Spain, 2019-10-31 20:43 (2424 d 01:12 ago) – Posting: # 20739
Views: 8,860

Hi Helmut,

❝ I could confirm that in Phoenix WinNonlin 8.1 (multiplied the first T value of the EMA’s reference data sets by 10)...


❝ I 2144.00 2479.70

2143.04 2517.74


Very strange in deed. I just got the same result in SAS (2144--> 2143.04). I only have time to test the data set 1. I guess it's probably the RTFM time for us. Maybe Detlew has some insight. I'll check the SAS manual after his comment :-D

All the best,
Shuanghe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
127 visitors (0 registered, 127 guests [including 21 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:56 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5