Serum cortisol AUC [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Jaime_R – Barcelona, 2008-07-14 17:34 (6559 d 04:53 ago) – Posting: # 2026
Views: 7,812

Dear JPL and Yayati!

❝ However, take care of any kind of pre-treatment adjustment, otherwise your

❝ AUC is biased.


Yes, you are right. But Yayati in his original post stated only two sampling points (pre- and post treatment). IMHO in such a case AUC is meaningless. I would only compare pre- and post-treatment - and not even think about calculating an 'AUC'. In the case of cortisol a baseline correction is debatable; maybe a transformation of the post-treatment data into a percentage of pre-treatment makes sense. For a discussion of baseline values see Senn (Cross-over Trials in Clinical Research, Section 3.16, Wiley, 2nd ed. 2006).

@Yayati:
It's not considered good statistical practice to gather data and seeking a method for evaluation afterwards. We should invest the better part in planning.

Regards, Jaime

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
283 visitors (0 registered, 283 guests [including 20 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:27 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5