Serum cortisol AUC [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Jaime_R – Barcelona, 2008-07-14 17:34 (6557 d 23:10 ago) – Posting: # 2026
Views: 7,789

Dear JPL and Yayati!

❝ However, take care of any kind of pre-treatment adjustment, otherwise your

❝ AUC is biased.


Yes, you are right. But Yayati in his original post stated only two sampling points (pre- and post treatment). IMHO in such a case AUC is meaningless. I would only compare pre- and post-treatment - and not even think about calculating an 'AUC'. In the case of cortisol a baseline correction is debatable; maybe a transformation of the post-treatment data into a percentage of pre-treatment makes sense. For a discussion of baseline values see Senn (Cross-over Trials in Clinical Research, Section 3.16, Wiley, 2nd ed. 2006).

@Yayati:
It's not considered good statistical practice to gather data and seeking a method for evaluation afterwards. We should invest the better part in planning.

Regards, Jaime

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
345 visitors (0 registered, 345 guests [including 22 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:44 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5