Why BE testing use 90 CI [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2019-03-04 00:07 (2673 d 09:10 ago) – Posting: # 19992
Views: 6,994

Dear Akash,

❝ This is where the 90% CI comes into the equation. There is a (not more than) 5% risk associated with it (1-2*alpha).


My understanding of the reason why: the true T/R ratio cannot be at the same time lower than 0.8 and higher than 1.25. So even if you test the lower limit with a 5 % risk, and the higher limit with a 5 % risk, the overall risk still remains 5 % for the patients, not 10 %.

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,572 registered users;
371 visitors (0 registered, 371 guests [including 28 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:18 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5